What’s in my bag? Well, if you must know and also to keep myself from sounding like a broken record, this page was created. Actually, since a number of you have asked what I shoot with, here is a shortlist (and it is a very short and lean list, as I’ve only been doing DSLR photography since April 2014) of my tools of the trade.
HARDWARE
- Canon EOS 6D
- Canon Rebel SL1 (borrowed, on occasion)
- Canon EF 100 f/2.8L macro (1:1) lens
- Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM lens
- Sigma APO DG OS HSM 150-500mm f/5.6-6.3 telephoto lens
- Canon Speedlite 320EX flashgun and flash diffuser
- (a rarely used) tripod without an Italian-sounding name
Photography is also the art of knowing that no matter how much equipment you have, you always need more. In the bid to capture more realism behind the camera, we seem to need more artifices. What a not-so-delicious irony! 😉
My macro lens takes care of those flowers, insects, and any other subjects that I really want to shoot closeups of. (Should I succumb to the lure of the Canon MP-E 65mm 5:1 macro lens, you’ll be the first to see my results). My Sigma super telephoto lens is my “walkaround” lens as I tend to shoot wildlife most of the time. As the camera expert at the London Drugs I bought it from warned me, I would (and still do) get a fair number of comments–some whispered, some not, all in awe–about its size. I have stopped traffic by hauling around The Beast. It certainly is a good workout for the arm that carries it.
I currently don’t use anything but the most basic HOYA filters to protect the all-important glass on my camera. Perhaps a ND (neutral density) filter one day, if my love for photographing wildlife spills over into portraiture or landscape photography. 🙂
In regards to post-processing, here is what I use to convert and transform my RAW files to usable formats for print and online display:
SOFTWARE
- DxO Optics Pro 8.5 Elite (to convert RAW files to JPG/TIF/etc., and tweak colour/tone/etc.)
> See this post, Shooting in [the] RAW, for more about why I now shoot in the RAW. < - Adobe Photoshop Elements 10 (mainly for watermarking and spot adjustments).
Remember that your camera equipment is just a tool. It can’t take sharp, vivid, colourful, dramatic, or playful photos, or evoke strong emotions in others. You are the only one who can make the magic happen behind the lens. Happy Shooting! ♠
My bag has a wonderful 105mm and three key lenses for my wildlife photos, a 70-200, 200/400 and a 300 as well as my D3s and D4s. Being a woman, people are always asking how I can hold the large lenses for any length of time. It ain’t easy. But oh so worth it. My husband kept giving me longer lenses thinking I would then shot Grizzlies from further back. As he says, they only let me get the bear larger in the frame! How true!
LikeLiked by 1 person
haha, that is true! unless you are a hummingbird or small bird fanatic — in which case a long lens is necessary! 🙂
I don’t get asked how I can hold a 500 mm telephoto for hours 🙂 but I think I’d draw the line at anything higher than 600 mm. I wince when I see 1000 mm lenses being toted by professional photographers without a care in the world. Of course, they’re probably covered by insurance for their equipment. 🙂
I’m not the type to mount my camera to a tripod and just haul that contraption around — it always scares me that no matter how well secured my camera is, the whole thing could just pop off and pull a London Bridge on me!! 🙂
LikeLike
I never have time to set up a tripod! Suddenly there is the shot! I had a 600mm for awhile but gave up trying to haul it around. Even in my car it was too much. But how I loved having that 1200mm with my 2x converter. Sigh
LikeLiked by 1 person
I know what you mean. Unless you have wildlife subjects who are so accommodating that they don’t budge from their spot (or are relatively still) for minutes, setting up a tripod can cost you the money shot! 🙂
I do have a Tamron 2X teleconverter, but I’ve barely made friends with it. I simply try to get closer to my subjects, and as I don’t use blinds or bait, that can sometimes be a difficult proposition! 🙂
LikeLike
Unfortunately, my getting closer to Grizzlies, ie closer than 100 feet or so, makes my other half very nervous. And may have the same effect in the Bears. Doesn’t stop me, though I worry about bothering the Bears.
LikeLiked by 1 person
a very good point!! 🙂
the largest, most dangerous wildlife I’ve photographed to date is black-tailed deer … not quite so terrifying as grizzlies. 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
I know Grizzlies should be terrifying but I find them awesome. And they have the ability to look like big teddy bears. Not a good way to view them. But they have a very strong pull for me.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I feel the same way about snakes and spiders! the terrifying part, not their resemblance to big teddy bears. 🙂
LikeLike
But they make wonderful subjects for photos?
LikeLiked by 1 person
indeed they do!
https://whsimphotos.wordpress.com/2015/07/24/dont-call-me-four-eyes/
🙂
LikeLike
Just as long as you keep the spiders in sight! I’ve lost one once from my viewfinder, only to discover it on top of the lens.
LikeLiked by 1 person
ROTFL! that’s funny! I had some something similar happen when I was trying to photograph 16 Pine Siskins in the backyard earlier this spring. 2 of them figured that my 500mm telephoto lens would make a good perch, and hopped onto it, one after the other, while staring at me! 🙂 🙂 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person